Staffbase is a widely used internal communications platform that helps organizations improve how they connect with employees through mobile apps, intranets, and digital communication tools. It is known for targeting mid‑market and enterprise companies that want to unify communications under one system. The platform offers employee apps, email design, analytics, and integration capabilities, positioning itself as an enterprise‑grade solution for structured communications.
For HR leaders, Internal Communications Specialists, and Employee Engagement Managers, the choice often comes down to balancing Staffbase’s enterprise strengths with its limitations—such as complex rollout, lack of transparent pricing, and limited suitability for smaller organizations. This article reviews verified features, Staffbase reviews, and pricing insights from trusted sources, while also showing how HubEngage provides a more flexible, cost‑effective alternative that scales for organizations of all sizes.
Key Features of Staffbase
According to the Staffbase website, the platform offers tools designed to streamline employee communication and engagement. Key features include:
- Employee App & Intranet: Mobile-first app and intranet designed for deskless and knowledge workers.
- Content Management System (CMS): Central hub to create and distribute content.
- Email Designer: Branded newsletters and email campaigns.
- Analytics: Insights into employee reach and engagement.
- Integrations: Connects with Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, and HRIS platforms.
However, reviewers frequently note that the platform is complex to implement and can feel overwhelming for smaller teams without dedicated IT support.
Staffbase Feature Matrix
| Feature | Strengths | Limitations |
|---|---|---|
| Employee App & Intranet | Mobile-first design, strong for frontline | Requires IT support, complex rollout |
| CMS | Centralized content hub | Limited customization flexibility |
| Email Designer | Good for branded campaigns | Can be cumbersome to use |
| Analytics | Detailed reporting on reach | Expensive to scale |
| Integrations | Works with M365, GSuite | Setup can be lengthy |
Staffbase Reviews
Feedback across trusted review sites highlights both strengths and challenges:
- G2: Staffbase holds a rating of 4.6/5 based on verified G2 reviews. Users praise its mobile-first design and ability to unify communications. Moreover, some note that customization can be limited and implementation requires significant planning.
- Capterra: On Capterra, Staffbase also scores highly, with users appreciating the reach for frontline employees. On the other hand, common cons include high costs and steep learning curves.
- TrustRadius: On TrustRadius, reviews mention strong analytics but also point out that scaling the system for complex organizations can be expensive.
Review Summary Table
| Platform | Rating | Common Pros | Common Cons |
|---|---|---|---|
| G2 | 4.6/5 | Mobile-first, unified comms | Limited customization, long implementation |
| Capterra | 4.5/5 | Strong for frontline workers | High costs, steep learning curve |
| TrustRadius | 8.8/10 | Analytics, reporting | Expensive to scale, complex setup |
Overall sentiment: Staffbase reviews consistently recognize it as a strong enterprise-grade solution. However, the same Staffbase reviews also highlight high costs, complex rollout, and limited flexibility for small to mid-sized businesses.
For broader industry feedback, you can also consult Gartner Peer Insights where Staffbase is often referenced among enterprise communication tools.
Staffbase Pricing Plans
Staffbase does not publish transparent pricing on its website. Most reviews and analyst commentary note that pricing depends on company size, number of users, and selected modules. According to customer feedback on review platforms, Staffbase is often considered expensive compared to alternatives.
Staffbase may not be the best fit for organizations with fewer than 1,000 employees, as their primary focus and case studies highlight mid‑market and enterprise deployments. In contrast, HubEngage openly serves small to large businesses with scalable pricing starting at $1 per user per month.
Pricing Comparison
| Platform | Transparency | Starting Price | Best Fit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Staffbase | No public pricing | Not disclosed | Mid-to-large enterprises |
| HubEngage | Transparent | Starts from $1 per user/month | SMB to Enterprise |
For HR and Internal Comms leaders, this lack of clear pricing from Staffbase makes it difficult to budget effectively. In contrast, HubEngage’s transparent pricing provides clarity for organizations of all sizes.
Alternatives to Staffbase
Organizations evaluating Staffbase often compare it against other leading employee communication tools. Common Staffbase alternatives include:
- HubEngage – A flexible, cost-effective platform that can start with a single hub (e.g., instant messaging) and expand to include recognition, surveys, intranet, email campaigns, and more.
- LumApps – Strong for enterprise intranets, though it has similar challenges around pricing and complexity.
- Simpplr – A modern intranet solution, but focused more on knowledge workers than frontline employees.
- Workvivo – Now part of Zoom, focused heavily on employee experience, but less modular than HubEngage.
- Blink – A frontline communication app designed for mobile-first engagement.
- Interact Software – A digital workplace platform known for social intranet capabilities.
- MangoApps – A unified employee app offering communication, collaboration, and intranet features.
- Unily – A global digital workplace platform used by large enterprises.
- FirstUp – A workforce communications platform focused on reaching every employee.
Alternatives Comparison Table
| Platform | Strengths | Limitations | Modularity | Gamification | Channels | Best For | Pricing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HubEngage | Great UI/UX, Affordable, Fully Customizable, Google/Microsoft/HRIS/Payroll Integrations, AI + gamification | Newer compared to legacy players | Yes | Yes | Mobile, Web, Email, SMS, Displays, Teams, Slack, WhatsApp, Google Workspace | SMB to Enterprise | Starts at $1/user/month |
| LumApps | Enterprise intranet, Google/Microsoft integrations | Expensive, complex setup | Limited | No | Mobile, Web, Email, Teams, Slack, Google Workspace | Large Enterprises | Not disclosed, typically expensive |
| Simpplr | UI/UX focused on knowledge workers | Less effective for frontline staff | Limited | No | Mobile, Web, Email | Large Enterprises | Not disclosed |
| Workvivo | Employee experience focus, Zoom integration | Limited modularity, pricing not transparent | Limited | Partial (basic recognition) | Mobile, Web, Email, Teams, Slack | Mid-Large Enterprises | Not disclosed |
| Blink | Mobile-first app, strong for frontline communication | Less suited for complex enterprise intranets | Limited | No | Mobile, Web, Email | Frontline-focused SMBs | Not disclosed |
| Interact Software | Prominently social intranet capabilities | Can be complex to customize | Limited | No | Mobile, Web, Email | Enterprises needing social intranet | Not disclosed |
| MangoApps | Unified app with comms, collab, intranet | Can feel overwhelming with too many features | Yes | Partial | Mobile, Web, Email, Teams, Slack | SMBs to mid-market | Not disclosed |
| Unily | Enterprise-grade digital workplace | High cost, complex setup | Limited | No | Mobile, Web, Email, Teams | Global enterprises | Not disclosed |
| FirstUp | Workforce communications orchestration | Pricing not transparent, enterprise-focused | Limited | No | Mobile, Web, Email | Large workforces | Not disclosed |
Why HubEngage Beats Staffbase
While Staffbase is powerful, HubEngage offers several advantages:
- Cost Savings: HubEngage pricing starts from $1 per user per month, making it far more budget-friendly compared to Staffbase’s enterprise pricing.
- Flexibility: Start with a standalone app like instant messaging or recognition, then add hubs (communications, surveys, intranet, etc.) as your needs grow. Staffbase typically requires broader, upfront commitments.
- Ease of Adoption: HubEngage is designed for fast rollout without complex IT dependencies, enabling small to large organizations to implement quickly.
- Multi-Channel Reach: Communicate across mobile apps, intranet, SMS, email, Teams, Slack, WhatsApp, and digital signage—all from one platform.
- Gamification & AI: Built-in gamification and AI tools drive higher engagement and automate content creation, areas where Staffbase lags behind.
- Better Fit for SMBs: Staffbase may not be the best fit for organizations with fewer than 1,000 employees, whereas HubEngage is intentionally built to scale from SMBs to large enterprises.
- Granular Admin Controls: Unlike Staffbase, HubEngage provides robust role-based administration with granular permissions, making it easier to manage communications across complex structures.
- US-Based Support: With a strong US presence, HubEngage offers responsive support aligned with US business hours, compared to Staffbase whose support operations are primarily based in Europe.
In contrast to Staffbase, HubEngage provides agility and consolidation, helping companies save on both costs and administrative effort.
Staffbase vs HubEngage Comparison Table
| Aspect | Staffbase | HubEngage |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Not disclosed, often expensive | Starts at $1/user/month, transparent |
| SMB Fit | Best for 1,000+ employees | Scales from SMB to enterprise |
| Features | App, intranet, CMS, analytics, email | Modular hubs (comms, intranet, recognition, surveys, email, chat, AI) |
| Admin Controls | Limited granular permissions | Robust role-based admin with detailed permissions |
| Support | Primarily Europe-based | Strong US-based support |
| Adoption | Complex rollout | Fast, easy adoption |
| Engagement | Limited gamification | Gamification + AI automation |
| Channels | Mobile, Web, Email | Mobile, Web, Email, SMS, Displays, Teams, Slack, WhatsApp, Google Workspace |
Conclusion
Staffbase is a strong option for large enterprises seeking a structured internal communications solution. However, its high costs, complex rollout, and lack of transparent pricing create challenges for many organizations. HubEngage stands out as the better alternative, offering modular flexibility, faster adoption, and substantial cost savings. For HR leaders and Employee Engagement Managers, HubEngage provides all the power of Staffbase—and more—without the heavy price tag.
FAQs
Is Staffbase suitable for small businesses?
Staffbase is generally better suited for mid-to-large enterprises. Smaller organizations often find the cost and implementation requirements prohibitive. HubEngage, starting at $1 per user per month, is a more accessible option.
What do Staffbase reviews say?
Staffbase reviews on G2, Capterra, and TrustRadius highlight strong communication tools and analytics. In addition, these Staffbase reviews frequently mention high pricing and rollout complexity.
Does Staffbase publish pricing?
No, Staffbase does not make pricing public. Costs are typically customized based on company size and selected modules. Many users report that it is expensive compared to alternatives like HubEngage.
What are the best Staffbase alternatives?
The best Staffbase alternatives include HubEngage, LumApps, Simpplr, Workvivo, Blink, Interact Software, MangoApps, Unily, and FirstUp. Among these, HubEngage is the most flexible and cost-effective, offering modular hubs and multi-channel communication at a significantly lower price point.
Why choose HubEngage over Staffbase?
HubEngage combines affordability, modular flexibility, multi-channel communication, gamification, and AI-driven automation—all designed for easier adoption and scalability compared to Staffbase.
Related Resources
5 Essential Internal Communication Tools & Software + Comprehensive Guide
Intranet Software Guide 2025: Definition, Types, Features & Benefit
Cloud Intranet: Definition, Benefits, Comparisons & Best Software
Intranet Apps: The Best Mobile Intranet Apps for 2025
Top 20 Employee Recognition Software & Apps in 2025 (Reviewed & Compared)
Best Text Messaging Service for Business: 2025 Comparison Guide
Best Internal Newsletter Software: Platforms, Tools & How to Choose (2025)
10 Best Team Communication Apps & Software for 2025
